India scores bio-piracy victory
By Sreeram Chaulia
India scored a stunning victory over China on June 10. It
did not come in the two Asian rivals’ unresolved boundary
dispute, nascent cyber-war, or race for influence in
international relations. Rather, it occurred in the
scientific-technical environs of the European Patent Office
(EPO) on a turf that is likely to become a major
battleground - bio-piracy or the theft of traditional flora,
fauna and knowledge forms.
The EPO, which grants trademark protection to individual
inventors and companies in up to 40 European countries, in
February delivered exclusive patents on two medicinal
herbaceous plants - andrographis and mint - to the Chinese
pharmaceutical giant Livzon.
With a board of directors closely connected to the Chinese
Communist Party, Livzon is one of Asia's leading
research-oriented bio-technology firms and enjoys a lion's
share of China's drug market. It is also successfully
foraying into overseas markets like Western Europe and the
Middle
East.
The EPO's award was a shot in the arm for Shenzhen-listed
Livzon, which had claimed in an application in January 2007
that the two herbs could be newfound ingredients to
manufacture medicines treating avian flu (H5N1 influenza).
With a robust laboratory of scientists that perform gene
recombination and biological extraction, Livzon planned to
cash in on the EPO's patent to produce a wonder drug for the
flu that has claimed the lives of millions of birds and
hundreds of humans since 1987.
But once the patent was awarded by the EPO, India sprung
into action, disputing Livzon's argument that treatment for
fever, detoxification and bird flu by employing andrographis
and mint was novel. In fact, it was a time-tested Indian
practice, where the herbs (locally known as "kalamegha"
and "pudina") had been regular inputs for curing
influenza and epidemic fevers.
India's traditional medicine system, ayurveda, which
can be traced to at least 1,500 BC, had accorded pride of
place to natural remedies based on a diverse range of plant
species. Pudina and kalamegha entered the
lexicon of India's home-healing
lore long ago and continue to feature in diet and culinary
preparations for their immunity-boosting, cooling and
aromatic qualities.
According to the Times of India, a complaint from India's
Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR) to the
EPO included extensive citations from texts of
ayurveda and yunani
(Greco-Arabic traditional medicine popular in South Asia),
"dating back to the 9th century" to demonstrate that
medicinal knowledge of pudina and kalamegha
was present for "ages".
The comprehensive evidence presented by India convinced the
EPO's three-member investigative panel, leading to the
cancelation of Livzon's patent.
The credit for saving these two household names from a
biotech giant goes to a digitalization project started by
the Indian government in the year 2000. After eight years of
laborious information-extraction by over 200 scientists and
language experts, India came up with a detailed database of
its traditional medicinal formulations translated from
Hindi, Sanskrit, Arabic, Persian, Urdu and Tamil into five
international languages - English, Japanese, French, German
and Spanish.
The resultant Traditional Knowledge Digital Library (TKDL)
documents more than 200,000 natural medicinal prescriptions
spread over 30 million pages of details. TKDL made
accessible to the world knowledge about Indian systems of
medicine (ISM) that had been confined to the sub-continent
due to their original renderings in arcane ancient
languages.
Armed with TKDL, India's scientists have launched a vigorous
challenge to bio-piracy of the country's medicinal heritage
by firms from Spain (melon extract to cure vitiligo) and the
United States ("ashwagandha" to cure depression,
insomnia and diabetes). Even
yoga postures have been rescued from quack
Western instructors in the lucrative market for alternative
health
exercise. CSIR estimated that before TKDL
was compiled, India was bleeding about 2,000 new patents
every year at the EPO and the United States Patent and
Trademark Office (USPTO).
The case against Livzon has brought home a realization in
India that bio-piracy, which had initially been feared to be
a predatory habit of Western multinationals, can arise right
across the border from Asian companies that are on a global
expansionary trot. By conclusively establishing the
existence of "prior art" on a specific plant, TKDL is
defending India's way of life itself, which revolves around
attaching spiritual significance to natural phenomena.
Fighting bio-piracy is a terrain that combines nationalistic
honor with practical concerns about denial of freely
available local knowledge and substances to common people
who have inherited them from their forebears. India stands
to gain in soft power internationally by helping other
threatened countries build their own local versions of TKDL
in what futurologist Jeremy Rifkin terms as the "biotech
century".
India has been approached with requests for technical
assistance from Malaysia, Thailand, Mongolia, Nigeria,
South
Africa and the African Regional Property
Organization to set up digital libraries of medicinally
beneficial local plant species. India already engages in
training young technicians from other countries in
information technology, agricultural science, engineering
and other fields, but the future growth area for sharing its
strengths in the knowledge economy with needy nations lies
in preservation of the biological commons.
The fact that Indian intellectuals like Vandana Shiva are
pioneers in alerting governments and making citizens aware
to the dangers of biological theft (her book, Biopiracy:
The Plunder of Nature and Knowledge appeared in 1996)
enhances the country's stature as a thought leader that can
position itself as a defending arm on which other countries
can lean.
The sensitivity and touchiness that characterize formerly
colonized societies when they confront brazen stealing of
local resources by foreign states and corporations ensure
that external aid to conserve local heirlooms is an
invaluable service that wins goodwill for India. There can
be no more rewarding form of foreign scientific
collaboration than one deemed as providing a bulwark against
forces that bankrupt national identity and culture.
Of all the varieties of plunder and looting that dot the
history of humanity, the one that pertains to flora and
fauna is coming to the fore as dominant due to the fait
accompli of decolonization. Biotech corporations need not
send armies of occupying soldiers to extract resources and
can still win patents over them through the logic of
copyright granting institutions that act as gatekeepers to
profitable Western
pharmaceutical markets.
Unless states and scientific bodies in vulnerable countries
wake up and follow the example set by India, they may
unwittingly hand over the keys to their national souls in a
cutthroat global economy in which stealth and informational
alacrity count as weapons.
Sreeram Chaulia is associate professor of world
politics at the OP Jindal Global University in Sonipat,
India.
(Copyright 2010 Asia Times Online (Holdings) Ltd. All rights
reserved. Please contact us about
sales, syndication and
republishing.) |